The Higgs - Boson

Annexe to my "Standard - Theory"

Not many people can imagine our “world” not being but “material”. 

All Newspapers nowadays are full of the news about the Nobel-Prize – winners, who created the actual standard theory with its quarks and bosons; and also about that newly by CERN found “X-boson”, that is assumed to transmit the forces within a quark. Their research had added much to the understanding of the quantum effects. So who am I to oppose myself to such coryphaei? But, call me stubborn, I’m still not convinced, that a “particle” transmits those forces.

Taking for granted, that there is no “ether” and that matter has always to be material, I don’t deny that such a particle exists; waves and particles are interchangeable. And there are all kind of such “particles” around.

And I wonder, why CERN didn’t find that particle earlier; As it is supposed to transmit the energies within all those atoms etc. the world and space had to be full of them!

Stephen Hawking, in his book “a brief history of time” describes the thing thus:

“In quantum mechanics, the forces or interactions between matter particles are all supposed to be carried by particles of integer spin: 0, 1 or 2. What happens is that a matter particle, such as an electron or a quark, emits a force carrying particle. The recoil from the emission changes the velocity of that matter particle. The force carrying particle then collides with another matter particle and is absorbed. This collision changes the velocity of the second particle, just as if there had been a force between the two matter particles.” Etc.

And in some graphics there are nice coloured balls bouncing on and off like billiard - balls.

Now consider the relations of the dimensions within an atom or subatomic structure and the whole space! And imagine those billiard balls as “material”. Firstly, assuming them as ”balls”, the surface of the “point of touching” of each other is only a fraction of the surface of that ball. And very small changes affect the vector of reaction. Every billiard player knows, that the balls wouldn’t bounce off at the right direction to any effect if not centred exactly! Considering the relations of size within atomic and subatomic structures and their relative distances, I think it difficult that “particles” would thus collide – at least not in sufficient quantities to any effect. (It happens, though, we can “see” that in a “cloud – chamber”. But that we can “see” it at all, proves that there are only single particles colliding - otherwise all we would see were only a “cloud”. And further consider, that those balls would emit their forces to all directions! And also the “strong and the weak forces” within an atom as well as  “gravity” are assumed to be transported by such bosons: And so consider the force of gravity transmitted thus from one star to another throughout space!

But it is also assumed that that X-boson found needs a field with which to interact. And if you consider “ether” as not existent, that brings you into a clinch.

But that field - in my opinion - being that “ether”, with other words that “time”, within that it produces “Waves” e.g. strings, such a “particle” as that “x-boson” is nothing but an other aspect of a wave, sailing within that “time” and using it as a transporting medium.

So I don’t really contradict the whole CERN – Research with all his coryphaei.

As stated before, those “Strings” produce the reciprocal forces, and only those forces within that ether – field, that “time”, acts as the “semblance” of “Matter”!

How can a sheer “force” have such an impact on matter then?.

Well, if a wave at the ocean overcomes a ship, you would say: it’s the “mass” of that wave that acts on the mass of the ship. Yes, the mass of the wave – along with its speed - creates the impact. (Even if the matter of the water is never touching the ship at all, only the reciprocal forces act on each other! )

All “Particles” science found up to day – as said before - have a “spin”. Matter particles have spin 1/2, “force transmitting particles” are assumed to have spin 0,1 or 2.

But (as even Wolfgang Pauli admitted) those “particles” could also be described as “waves”. So why not to say: “Spin 1/2, showing itself as “matter”, is a full wave with crests, trough and again crest (in more dimensions than our 3 perceived by us of course)”. Forces will be transmitted also by waves, only with other “spins”. Spin 0, 1 or 2! (See “electrons”)

And the medium, within all that sails, is the time, which consists of those vortexes, called by me “swivels”, who are all between them inseparable and fixedly interlaced, so to be able to transmit all those forces in form of waves!